Compare

Two tools, side by side. Openness included.

Pick two. The table shows their rating, their Openness score and the facts behind it, each from the vendor's own pages.

Platform A

Platform B

Side by side

UmbracoCreate & Publish Content

STOA rating

For builders

More about each tool

Pricing

Free plan availableFree plan

What it does

Add another tool (up to 4)

Want to compare general tools, like two CRMs or two project tools? Every tool page has a Compare button, with no limit.

Neither one does what you need?

Grab a 15-minute chat. Sometimes the answer is to build the missing piece next to what you run.

Grab a 15-minute chat

Strengths

Free open-source version with no licensing fees
Highly flexible and customizable for complex website needs
Strong developer community and long track record
Good fit for businesses needing a tailored digital experience

Weaknesses

Requires a .NET developer to set up and maintain — not beginner-friendly
High total cost of ownership when developer time is factored in
Steeper learning curve compared to WordPress or Squarespace
Cloud-hosted (Umbraco Cloud) plans can get expensive quickly

Key features

Build and manage websites and digital content using a .NET-based platform
Create custom page layouts and content structures without being locked into templates
Manage multiple websites or digital properties from one admin dashboard
Integrate with third-party tools and APIs through developer customization
Available as self-hosted open-source software or as a managed cloud service

STOA verdict

Umbraco is best for small businesses that already have a .NET developer on staff or budget to hire one, because this is not a DIY tool. The upside is that it's free to download and incredibly flexible for custom websites, but the real cost comes from developer time — expect to spend thousands just to get started.